What just is a politician? If we look this term up in a dictionary we will see that a politician is one who is a “member of a governing body that decides public policy or influences public opinion.” Another definition is “a seeker or holder of public office, who is more concerned about winning
favor or retaining power than about maintaining principles.”
Then we have the “Urban dictionary which defines the politician rather colorfully, if not with regretful accuracy.
A person who practices politics. “Politics” is derived from the words “poly” meaning “many”, and “tics” meaning “blood-sucking parasites.”
One who has perfected the art of lying.
A highly paid yes-man.
Sound familiar? What we have here is a group of people, mostly lawyers that are going to decide what is best for all of us. In the course of their duties these folks go about day after day trying to work out the best deal for their constituents and/or themselves. They will spend your money on the
most inept concepts, useless pet projects and use the same old tired cliches about family, education and safer streets. Lest we forget, manipulative psychological techniques over honest discussion.
But it has not always been this way. There was a time when these animals in office served for the betterment of the nation. A time when the course of a nation and its people was decided on using the principle and ethics that represented the majority of the populous. Tantamount was the goal of preserving
individual liberty and the advance of the general welfare of the people that they represented. To the discerning, it seems those days are the bygone of a time long since past.
In the course of a lifetime all of us have encountered various figures, both public and private that have their hand out trying to convince you that they have something you “need” or “must have” presenting you with a sales pitch that tries to convince you to buy into a product, a service, or a
philosophy. Walk down the main street of Las Vegas and the panhandlers hand you sex cards trying to entice you to rent a whore. Turn on the TV and you have so called preachers trying to prostitute Jesus to you for a price. Vote for a politician and he will betray you for the benefit of some lobbyist as he hikes up your taxes once again.
In politics, if you chose to participate by voting or by running for office, you will have a front row in observing the unbridled greed and uninhibited excesses that run throughout the human genome. The nefarious, obdurate and simplistic politicians intend to keep us, the constituent, blissfully
ignorant of the facts. Their mouths teem with useless and distorted information, their undertakings and grandiose plans are inefficient and doomed for failure. The people are pawns to be used and manipulated. If you listen to the politicians sing-song, chances are you won’t even notice his hand as it goes into your pocket. Only later, after you realize you’ve been robbed, will you truly understand that life isn’t fair. But support them we will. We must keep the “faith!”
Yes faith! Faith in the politician with his “new” ideas that will make your life better and solve all the social injustices in the world! Lets call this the American version of hegemony cultural change.*(The term was coined by the Italian philosopher and communist, Antonio Gramsci.) The eventual dominance (war of position) of one social group over another where the ruling class has come to be seen as the norm within the society as a whole. The hard reality is that
these ruling class whores are experts at manipulating, dividing (totalitarian world view)and fleecing (debt) their constituents. They claim to represent the “people” but serve the needs of themselves and/or the special interest groups.
The Politician.. 1. …tells you he is
not going to raise taxes on the middle class. Instead, he’s going to raise corporate income taxes as means to get rich corporations to pay their rightful share of government.*(What really happens? The corporation raises the price of its products, lower dividends and lays off its workers.)
Who pays the price for this deception? We do. Politicians of this ilk are intellectually and morally deficient. In defending their ideas, they promote injustice, poverty, and grinding despair. The chance for further prosperity is now foregone, unrealized and concealed.
2. …never responds to a problem by letting go of his power.
3. …controls the media in order to control the information the masses ingest.
4. …creates an atmosphere of fear where the masses surrender their freedom for security.
5. …creates illusions.*(They cite the sins of foreign rulers, and then ask us to join in killing their downtrodden subjects. The federal government was formed to protect Americans (defensive posture) and not foreign rulers and their subjects. Today we have a strongnational offense, but a very weaknational defense. America is surrounded by two oceans that protects the nation from invasion. What is needed is a missile defense that will repel a nuclear attack, and a border patrol that will protect us from those foreigners when they make their mad dash across the border.)
6. …offers the solution for problems he created.
7. …exploits situations such as a disaster for a photo-op and speech.
8. …most valuable skill is the ability to lie convincingly.
9. …panders to those who can help him, such as special interest groups.
10. …is always in campaign mode.
11. …is not what he says he is. One example would be a spendthrift liberal running as a fiscal conservative.
12. …comes into office with modest means and leaves office a millionaire.
In any case, I cannot believe how many actual, physical, breathing, thinking citizenry have fallen for the politicians subterfuge. Because of them, we are now observing the change in our society’s philosophy and values from freedom and justice to corruption, decay, cynicism, and injustice. All
of these “values” are artistically incorporated within American politics.
Priests.
Wiki offers the following description:“Priests
and priestesses have been known since the earliest of times and in the simplest societies. They exist in all or some branches ofJudaism,Christianity,Shintoism,Hinduism, and many otherreligions, as well, and are generally regarded ashaving good contact with the deity or deitiesof the religion to which they
subscribe,often
interpreting the meaning of events,performing the rituals of the religion, and to whom other believers often will turn for advice on spiritual matters.“
We will skip the urban dictionary this time around and focus on the profession.
In the Christian religion, the priest (the second grade of clergy) is someone that claims to be called of God, who exemplifies Christ and Christ’s church, and works towards the reconciliation of all people with God and one another. They perform leadership duties in administrating the
sacraments, worship services, and serve the membership in the area where they live and work.
Sounds warm and fuzzy doesn’t it? However, there is another side of this coin. Unlike any other profession, the priest stands as an intercessor between you and the Supreme Creator known as “God.” He is the middle man in the equation and claims that he will lead you on the “narrow road”
that leads to eternal life.
No politician would boast such a claim, but the priest does. Claiming more power than any government authority on earth, the priest sews his noesis fabric into a set of doctrines that he guarantees as the way, the truth and the light. The crucial main ingredient is faith. The membership are told
to have faith in God, and if we look at what the priest is really saying, it is“trust me.”Faith we understand is the confident belief or trust in a person, idea, or thing that is not based on proof. So how do you know if this person, the priest is trustworthy?
To trust one, you put your faith under that persons control. Faith involves a concept of approaching events or outcomes, and is used conversely for a belief system not resting on legitimate proof or material evidence. Informal usage of the word“faith”can be quite unspecific, and can be used in place of“trust or belief.”
Putting your faith in Armstrong-ism.
Generally speaking, in the realm of Armstrong-ism, some of these priestly leaders continue to go through life back-stabbing, back-biting, exhibiting anger and hostility towards others of the same or even different “faiths.”Theyare not
to be trusted by the summation of mentally balanced people. They have few if any true friends. They are the egotistical elite, placing themselves at the center of the world with no direct concern for others.
But our dear priests have a winning formula! Kindly, charismatic, showing outward respectability, loving and caring for their fellow man, their expressed wish of sharing the gospel and leading others to worship the deity they have chosen for us, is all a bit much to stomach. The reality
is that some who possess leadership positions in the various churches, use the membership as if they are ATM machines. Others of the priestly ilk pick and chose from the faithful for sexual trysts. Some desire your children. The truth is, this is an ecclesiastical power structure which is an oases for pedophiles, adulterers, stalkers and even murderers.
The organizational hierarchy co-operates to keep such misconduct from becoming public knowledge. They fail to oversee, educate, investigate or properly discipline the misconduct of the ministers, deacons or elders. They ensure that criminal behavior (not limited to those in leadership
positions) is never prosecuted or punished. You have just got to wonder if there is a mechanism of institutional restraint built into the system.
They are wolves masquerading as shepherds. They are what Wyatt Earp was to law enforcement in Americas Old West. Lawless, disgraceful and without a conscious, this ophidian cabal hides behind the facade of righteousness. Where is the righteous rage and singular purpose to prevail over
this corruption that is contributing to the mental diminution of both adults and their children within the corporate church?
“The world is a dangerous place to live, not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don’t do anything about it.” —Albert Einstein
The Fox and the Grapes.
“The fox who longed for grapes, beholds with pain
The tempting clusters were too high to gain;
Grieved in his heart he forced a careless smile,
And cried, “They’re sharp and hardly worth my while.” —Aesop(ca. 620–564 BCE)
This fable is about people who attempt to hold antagonistic ideas while attempting to maintain their belief system simultaneously. As the prophecies that enticed us into Herbert Armstrong’s family business continue to fail, we all have asked ourselves “What makes itworth their whileto stay?”
One of the great motivators of all time, used by both politician and priest, is the extraordinary psychological incentive known as “fear.” Following the successful soap salesman, the ministry uses diatribe, Herbert-style lunacy, to its utmost limits.Every despicable word, and manufactured falsehood paints a perfect picture of Armstrong style hysteria and bestowed hebdomadally as they unveil“a lesson for those with eyes to see.”
These lesson are not so much about spiritual issues as they should be, but they are about thecore characterof these self-satisfied, amateurish doomsday prophets. They consistently voice from the pulpit an extensive treatise whose hypothetical propositions (prophecies) are put forth without a shred of evidence or scholarship.With the catastrophic power of corporate church fascism and with the repression of an authoritarian government,they will never allow the blue ribbon tithe payer to rise up and challenge them as to their agone prophecies.If challenged, they will try to convince you that they are of unstained ethical standards and representatives of an all knowing and loving God. Suchlike the authoritative state, the church and the leaders are never erroneous in their edicts.
The rotting structure who’s foundation is built on the failed prophecies and falsehood of Herbert W. Armstrong can not stand. The door has been kicked in and the structure trembles before the fall. The fable of British Israel-ism has evolve and continues to evolve, all to fit the times
we live in. World events present new problems for the Armstrong groups. The world players are changing with antagonistic states or groups rising up and challenging America. Will the membership remember what they hear from the pulpit? Will they demand an accounting from the leadership when their prophecies fail?
History shows us that the minority will continue to follow the repressive, heavy handed mind control groups. What will be left as this structure fails? You will see small groups of people
shuffling from one end of the demolished shack to the other end. Like rats, they never leave, just doomed to become religious nomads within the structure of Armstrong-ism.
Conclusion:
Fear is the apical motivator that keeps people involved.
Fear of the ministry.
Fear of losing a fictional crown.
Fear of isolation by the current membership after leaving.
Fear of learning what is behind their cognitive dissonance.
Fear of change. Like the fox who could not obtain the grapes, they quit and renounce the objective goal. These are the real losers in the crumbling Armstrong empire. They will live in fear, unable to achieve their personal goals, in or out of the church. To these I say “Stay. You belong
in tinfoil-hat land.”Just what do you think of when you hear the word “Priest?”
Pornographers.
Developed in the 1973caseMiller v. California.Thereare three parts:
[1]Whether “the average person, applying contemporary
community
standards” would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest.
[2]Whether the work depicts/describes, in
apatently offensiveway, sexual conduct specifically defined
by applicable state law.
[3]Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks
seriousliterary, artistic, political or scientificvalue.
The work is considered obscene only if all three conditions are satisfied.
Patently offensive.
The phrase first appeared inRoth
v. United States, referring to any obscene acts or materials that are considered to be openly, plainly, or clearly visible as offensive to the viewing public.
TheRothstandard outlined what is to be considered obscene and thus not under First Amendment protection.
According to the “Roth Standard” a work is obscene if:
[1]The dominant theme of the material taken
as a whole appeals to a prurient interest in sex.
[2]The material is patently offensive because
it affronts contemporary community standards relating to the description or representation of sexual matters.
[3]The material is utterly without redeeming
social value.
The Rothstandard was largely replaced by theMillertestestablished byMiller v. California(1973).
Armstrongism
So what does Armstrongism have to do with pornography? More than you might think! Lets look at the Miller test.
“Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks seriousliterary, artistic, political or scientific
value.”
It is a well known fact that the groups known as the Churches of God havebuilt a cultural tradition that has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding in either religion or the sciences. Most reasonable people recognize this. The reality is that the churches have neverhad anything to offer that was supported by concrete evidence. Baseless, if not wishful claims filled the pages of the Plain Truth, the Good News, Tomorrow’s World, and countless other publications.
To serve as an example, take the October, 1969 edition of Tomorrow’s World where we read:
“There can be no doubt that the present Royal Family of Britain are the direct descendants of the ancient Jewish King, David, and that Queen Elizabeth II sits upon the very Throne of David, and that one day in the near future there will be another crowning – perhaps the last in
this age – on this Throne before the Messiah comes and takes over the very Throne which He was born to Occupy – the Throne of
His earthly father David.”
The quote above tells us that“There can be no doubt.”Really? British Israelism rests upon a method of interpreting prophecy which reduces the Scripture to the level of a cross-word puzzle. Texts are torn from their context, and misapplied without the slightest regard to their original meaning. How canthe churches of God be sowillinglyignorant of the most basic tenets of this fallacy and so eloquent in the denunciation of modern scholarship? With this in mind, how can we take any of the churches of God seriously? —Taken as a whole, the theory of British Israelism lacks seriousliterary, artistic, political or scientific value. See the Miller test, rule #3
The Missing Dimension in Sex
Of all the books ever released by the Worldwide Church of God, this has to be the biggest embarrassment of all. With comments by the author Herbert W. Armstrong, we learn these little tidbits of information:
"Many men themselves do not realize it, but the left testicle hangs a little lower in the scrotum than the right.”
And another favorite:“Many girls, participating in “necking” on
dates, do not realize at all that the boyfriend is sexually aroused, ready for and desiring coitus, in a matter of five or ten seconds’ time.”
And speaking with the authority of Jesus Christ we read:“Just about every so-called “authority” whose book I have seen, and the medical associations, universally chorus the minor discordant error that masturbation does no harm. I say to you onauthority of Jesus Christ and the Word of God that it does do harm– not only physically (even though temporary), but psychologically,
emotionally, mentally, and most of all, MORALLY and SPIRITUALLY.”
Leaving little to the imagination, Armstrong injects on to the reader, pictures of the femaleclitoris, and male penis.He goes into great detail on how to stimulate your sexual partner, and achieve anorgasm. With his infinite wisdom, Herbert instructs us as to what position to take during intercourse, and the evils of masturbation.
What strikes me as I read this book is the dogmatic approach he takes with the subject. Not only does he present himself as one of the “Masters and Johnson” authoritarians on the subject of sex, he is prophet, dating coach, lawgiver, judge, child rearing professional, marriage
expert, and biologist! —The dominant theme of the material taken as a whole, appeals to aprurient
interestof the average person. We see in thepsycheof Herbert W. Armstrong “A morbid, degrading and unhealthy interest in
sex, as distinguished from a mere
candid interest in sex.” Knowing the history of Armstrong and some in his cult, I label this book as religious pornography. See the Miller test, rule #1
Compromising your integrity
One of the most compelling issues we have facing us in these times falls under the heading of Integrity. We are living in a new age of immense abundance in the areas of information, communication and possibilities. This new level of intensity can open many doors to almost
anyone who wants to accomplish anything.
But the more we stretch ourselves toward accomplishing what we want in life, the more we are presented with the question of whether or not to break our own rules and make compromises. What we have come to recognize as our own truth comes under the heading of personal Ethics.
We describe ethics as:
Rational thinking.
Personal behavior intended for the highest good or best interests for all of society.
Honorable ways to accomplish goals.
When we compromise our personal ethics it often happens very subtly, with escalations of commitment and expectations over time. When we find ourselves acting in opposition to our values, this creates an internal experience of being divided. This, in turn, leads to varying
degrees of discomfort and psychological conflict.
This is known as cognitive dissonance.
Just how far would you compromise your ethics in order to get ahead?
Let us look to pornography for an answer.
The pornographer recruits by exploiting:
Greed, in order to manipulate the moral integrity of the performer.
The excessive sexual desire or addictions of the performer.
Revenge against boyfriend, girlfriend, or *parental authorities.
Moral weakness of the performer.
The want of fame or notoriety.
*Neglect or abuse. Childhood trauma or other underlying influences.
The performers compromise their ethics (if they have any) by acceptance of the offer.
They:
Selling out future opportunities in life.
Souring of relationships they may have with others outside the realm of their work.
Believe they are taking charge of their lives while they degrade and humiliating themselves.
All of us (the performers) who have been part of the Armstrong religion are guilty of ignorance and/or compromising our ethics. Our ethics are what defined us before the church experience and what defines us after. We must retain the ability to be honest with ourselves and admit that we have
in the past, shut out of our minds, that inner
voice of reason that we had been suppressing. As performers, just what were we thinking when:
We degraded ourselves by embracing Armstrong-ism?
We sold out what could have been a brighter future?
We shunned family and friends outside of our scope of believe?
We thought of ourselves as members of Gods true church at one time, the stark reality was that the ministry used us like ATM machines, abused and exploited us. Upon realizing these facts, we stood before the world as fools, degraded, humiliated, stripped and flogged. Like pornography, the Armstrong
religion destroyed our marriages, families,
and relationships. We became desensitized towards our fellow man, raging at the world in condemnation. But we were no different than the pornographer or recruit. We sold our integrity down the river when we accepted the twisted premise of the religion and all the baggage it came with.
The pornographers are those who exploited our weakness’s, recruited and maintained us in the religion.Of
the participants, the Armstrong religion is an imitation of the master-slave, conqueror-victim paradigm.
The masters exploited, the conquerable bowed a knee in submission. —The religious group protected ministers, and members who were child molesters, adulterers, thieves and stalkers. The member who complained is demonized and expelled. The “work” is patently offensive by its representation
of being a religion and by who and what it values. “By their fruits
you shall know them.” Matt. 7:16 See the Miller test, rule #2
Conclusion
We have compared three types or classes of people here. The politician, the priest, and now the pornographer. What they all have in common is the basic art of deceptive practices. If we are to believe that one is superior to the other, we are still walking in error. People who never learn this lesson
will
always be a easy mark for the con man. Whether in a thousand dollar suit or in torn robes, the basic underlying factor here is that men desire power over another. It is a basic theme throughout history. The master and slave relationship.
In the slave relationship, one has little recourse to avoid the consequences. Yes, we all havecompromisedour integrity at one time or another. The true test of our character is if we allow ourselves or families to continue in error. To shut ones eyes to facts, to stop up the ears and refuse to hear, to not protest injustices, all of this is to accommodate whatever or whoever your master is.
The master knows no bounds. Like the pornographer, he exploits the weakness of the human being, allowing you to degrade and humiliate yourself. Yet you can change this relationship at any time. You can withdraw your permission from this person or group that comes between you and your God.
The rock-solid principles of freedom of thought
and freedom of speech takes moral integrity and ethics to put into place.
Think of it this way. Armstrong-ism is like walking into a crowded room and telling everyone there that its an open party with unlimited access to alcohol and sex. What could be the outgrowth if the host doesn’t have the ability to manage the crowd?
