Click here for Ambassador Watch

 

Now or never

 

The United Church of God hasn’t exactly been lucky in its choice of presidents: one now running his own rival sect, and two cast down after serving just a single term.

But then, luck has very little to do with it.

In the early days it appeared that UCG might reach a critical mass, with 20,000 members behind it, to survive and thrive. More-so because this wasn’t to be just another sect built around a single personality, but a genuine team effort.

But no church, and in particular a small denomination, can prosper with the kind of hemorrhaging that UCG has experienced in its first decade. No church can take root when its best and brightest are first sidelined, then marginalized, and all too often purged and vilified. No church can survive when the real agenda seems to be keeping control in the hands of a few tight-fisted mandarins at any cost.

And the cost has been extraordinarily high. Whole congregations peeling away, taking talented and committed members with them. Static growth. A rapidly graying constituency.

As the United Church of God prepares to mark its first 10 years, the organization seems to have reached a watershed. Another president has been given his marching orders, and observers both within and outside wonder just which way the largest Church of God grouping will now lurch.

The majority view seems to be that the control freaks are in the ascendancy. The UCG may be heading for the edge of the cliff, but this faction proposes to simply ram the throttle down all the way. Perhaps the Edsel is supposed to fly? Power needs to be concentrated in even fewer hands – for the good of the majority of course.

A second view is that reason is about to finally prevail. UCG will become a more open organization, in tune with the assurances made when it was founded. Independent congregations will be welcome to affiliate with Cincinnati , but manage their own affairs through local boards. Perhaps some of the “lost sheep” might return.

Which of these outcomes is most likely? The smart money is on the first, but only if UCG stakeholders shrug their shoulders, sit on their hands and determine to just let it happen.

After ten long years you have to wonder, where is the “ginger group”, the “loyal opposition” which is advocating a return to principles on which UCG was established? Granted, some people have been locked out of the process, but many more still remain. Why aren’t their voices raised? The reality seems to be that Church of God members are frozen by their own sense of powerlessness. They see themselves not as active participants but passive recipients; victims of the fickleness of their leaders. They may have opinions, but they “know” those opinions don’t count.

And they couldn’t be more wrong.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to work out that UCG’s new president will need to be a healer. An individual who will be less concerned about who is in charge of what, and more concerned with bringing people together. Not just the elders, and certainly not just the retreaded WCG administrators with their corporate mentality and failed agendas. This time it must be everyone, and especially the people who make it all possible through their participation and support.

This is the time for ordinary members to step up and take the initiative. In the few precious weeks before irreversible decisions are made there is a window of opportunity. It’s a time to speak out about a vision for the future of the church, to make time to clearly tell ministers and administrators what needs to be said. Those few men privileged under the constitution to select the next president need to hear that clear message from those at the grassroots. This is their church – not the sole property of those on the Council of Elders (legal documents to the contrary notwithstanding – an ongoing scandal in itself).

Make no mistake; the new leadership will set the tone for the years ahead. And every UCG member has a huge stake in that. Even without a vote, they have a voice, and a responsibility to now make it heard.

“The entire process is intended to culminate with the Council's selection of the president on May 12, just prior to the annual meeting of the General Conference of Elders in Cincinnati , May 14-16, 2005 .” (Doug Johnson, COE report)

The clock is already ticking.